Tag: Progress payments

Property Development Finance in NZ: How It Works

Property development can be a powerful way to create value in the New Zealand property market, but it is fundamentally different from traditional property investment. Rather than relying on long-term market growth, development involves actively improving land or buildings, creating value through construction or subdivision, with the intention of generating profit at completion. Property development is often considered a sort-term investment strategy compared with traditional property investment which is a long-term game.

Before committing to a project, one of the most important questions to understand is: how does property development finance work? Unlike a standard residential mortgage, development finance is structured around feasibilities, risk management, staged funding, and clearly defined exit strategies.

What Is Property Development?

Property development refers to purchasing land, or an existing property, to increase its value with the intention of selling the completed project for a profit. The nature of the development – either construction or subdivision – depends on the nature of the site. Unlike property investment, which takes a more passive approach in following market growth, development involves actively finding ways to create value.

What Counts as Property Development?

In the New Zealand context, property development typically includes:

• Renovations or flips
• Constructing new dwellings
• Subdividing land into multiple titles
• Replacing an existing dwelling with higher-density housing (such as townhouses or apartments)
• Converting or redeveloping commercial buildings
• Delivering mixed-use projects

How Development is Different from Property Investment

Property investment typically involves purchasing an existing property to generate rental income – the focus here is on yield and cashflow. After holding the asset for an extended period, subsequent (but often unrealised) profit is also generated from long-term capital gains based on market movements.

Property development is a more active approach to value creation. It requires capital, a feasibility analysis, consultant and contractor coordination, as well as the ability to balance construction and market risks within defined timeframes. Returns are not simply based on the market. In fact, pricing stability is often favourable as it often means less fluctuation in feasibility assumptions. With the exception of a falling market, liquidity and sales activity can be more important than price growth.  Disciplined execution, tight cost control, and a sound exit strategy are key to completing a successful property development project. Making this possible is a well-structured development finance.

How Does Property Development Finance Work?

Unlike a standard home loan, development finance is structured around risk, project timelines, and feasibility. Lenders make assessments holistically, examining the whole development, which includes feasibility assumptions (both as costs and end values), developer experience, consultant and contractor experience, and exit strategy strength. Funding is centred around a mix of equity and layered debt known as the capital stack.

1. The Capital Stack

• Developer equity refers to the capital you contribute to the project, whether as land value or cash. Most lenders require a meaningful equity position to absorb risk and demonstrate commitment.
• Senior debt is the primary loan (first mortgage) facility used to fund land acquisition and construction. It is typically advanced as a percentage of total project cost and/or projected end value.
• Mezzanine finance (or subordinated debt/second mortgages) is a loan that sits behind the senior first ranking mortgage. It is often used to reduce the equity requirement of the developer making their equity go further. The increased leverage can also increase the return on equity metrics; however it also increases funding costs and overall risk associated with the project.

2. Feasibility and Funding Assessment

Before approving a facility, lenders assess the project’s financial viability in detail. This is where many first-time developers underestimate the scrutiny involved. Key metrics typically include:

• Total Development Cost (TDC): land, construction, professional fees, interest, and contingencies
• Gross Realisation Value (GRV): the projected end sale value of the completed project
• Loan-to-Cost (LTC) or Loan-to-GRV ratios: how much leverage is being applied

3. Land Funding vs Construction Funding

Development finance is often structured in two parts. The first is land funding, which supports site acquisition. Depending on timing and structure, this may later roll into the construction facility. The second is construction funding, which covers build costs and associated project expenses. This is usually approved based on completed designs, fixed-price build contracts, and confirmed feasibility. Some projects may require presales before construction funding is fully advanced, although no presale development finance is also viable, depending on the lender and project.

4. Progress Drawdowns During Construction

Unlike residential mortgages, development finance is not advanced as a lump sum. Construction funds are released in stages, aligned to completed works. Before each drawdown, lenders typically require:

• A quantity surveyor (QS) report
• Confirmation of milestone completion
• Updated cost-to-complete assessment

5. Exit Strategy

Every development loan is approved with a defined exit in mind.

Common exit strategies include:

• Selling completed dwellings and repaying the facility
• Refinancing into long-term investment lending
• Staged sell-down of a multi-unit project

Lenders assess the strength and realism of the exit plan as part of approval. Without a clear and achievable exit strategy, even a profitable project on paper may struggle to secure funding.

What Lenders Look for in Development Finance Applications

Development finance approval is driven by risk assessment. Lenders evaluate not just the project, but the developer’s ability to execute and exit successfully.

At ASAP Finance, we structure applications around the factors that materially influence credit decisions.

Experience and Delivery Capability

Track record matters. Lenders assess prior project experience, financial history, and the strength of the wider team – including builders and consultants. For newer developers, conservative project scope and strong professional support become more important.

Equity and Financial Position

A meaningful equity contribution demonstrates commitment and absorbs first-loss risk. Lenders review the source of funds, liquidity, and overall financial capacity to manage unexpected delays or cost increases.

Feasibility Strength

Projected sale values, build costs, timelines, and contingency allowances must be commercially realistic. Lenders will stress-test assumptions to ensure the project remains viable under pressure.

Exit Clarity

Every facility is approved with repayment in mind. Whether through sell-down or refinance, the exit strategy must be credible and supported by market evidence.

Structuring for Property Development Success with ASAP Finance

Development finance is ultimately about aligning risk, structure, and execution. The more disciplined the preparation, the stronger the funding outcome.

The most successful property development projects in New Zealand use an appropriate structure. From acquisition through to exit, every stage of a project carries financial implications. Central to managing risk and protecting margins is close coordination and a sound understanding of how development finance enables value creation.

At ASAP Finance, we work with developers to structure development and construction loans that support projects from site purchase through to completion. Our focus is on creating a financially sound framework aligned with your goals. If you’re considering a development or want clarity around how development finance works for your next project, get in touch with the team at ASAP Finance to discuss your plans.

Progress Payments: What Lenders Look for when processing drawdown Requests

When it comes to property development and construction finance, progress payments form the backbone of how funds are advanced throughout a project. For lenders like ASAP Finance, this is one of the most critical aspects of loan management – ensuring funds are released only as value is created on site, and almost always on a cost-to-complete basis.

The Basics of Progress Payments

A progress payment or “drawdown” (also known as a DD) refers to the staged release of loan funds throughout the construction or subdivision process. Rather than advancing the entire facility upfront, funds are released progressively as the project reaches agreed milestones. Note, payments are almost always made on a cost-to-complete basis (which we’ve covered in a previous blog How Cost-to-Complete Funding Works in Development ).

This structure ensures borrower equity is applied first to the project and that the lender’s loan facility is sufficient to complete the project.

What Lenders Look for in Drawdown Requests

Every drawdown request is assessed on a simple principle: “after paying the DD request, is the amount being retained by the lender sufficient to complete the project?”.

While there are a range of other considerations when making a payment, the lenders final decision will eventually tie back to that fundamental question.

Consideration for Lenders

Before approving a drawdown, prudent lenders will typically consider the following. In most cases, an independent Quantity Surveyor (QS) report will also be required, which addresses many of these points in greater detail.

• Budget review: the lender will review the full project budget to identify any areas where cost increases are known or anticipated. The aim is to ensure that after the requested payment is made, the lender remains sufficient funds on a cost-to-complete basis. This includes confirming appropriate allocation of contingency sums and factoring in forward-looking costs that may not have been fully identified early in the project.
• Evidence of progress: the lender may go to site or request photos confirming works done.
• Invoices from the main contractor and relevant subcontractors: for the raw build, some lenders may not require individual subtrade invoices and instead pay per the agreed milestones (however a QS will almost certainly ask for sub trade invoice and confirmation that all previous invoices have been paid)
• Program: lenders will assess whether the project remains on track against the approved program. Delays often translate directly into increased costs, this is because capitalised interest and fees form part of the overall funding facility and budget. If the revised completion date extends beyond the original term of the loan, the lender may require evidence that the borrower can cover any resulting shortfall, which may include an additional equity injection.
• Council inspection signoffs: Evidence that key council inspections have been passed, such as drainage, pre-line, or pre-roof stages. These provide independent verification that works completed on site meet the required building standards and align with the approved plans.
• Cost over-runs: If a drawdown request exceeds the value of the completed work, the lender may only approve a partial payment. This protects the lender from over-exposure if delays, defects, or cost overruns occur later in the build.

Site visits

As mentioned, expect your lender to undertake a site visit. Site inspections are an important step, providing a real-world check against what’s claimed on paper. They also give the lender valuable insight into the quality of workmanship and general site activity. A well-organised, well-resourced and active site signals good project management, while disorganisation or inactivity can indicate emerging risks, unpaid bills or potential delays.

Council Inspections

Council inspections play a critical role in the progress payment process, serving as an independent safeguard for both lender and borrower. Each passed inspection verifies that the works completed meet building code requirements.

In a residential build, inspections typically cover key stages such as foundations, framing, and pre-line etc. while subdivision elements focus on civil works such as earthworks, utilities connections, retaining, drainage and driveway (including vehicle crossing) sign offs.

These inspections provide independent assurance that all works are compliant and completed in line with approved plans. They also help confirm there are no outstanding or remedial items that could undermine the project’s cost-to-complete position or the security of the loan.

Greenfield Land Subdivisions

Green field subdivisions carry their own complexities. Unlike infill projects, where subdivision works are relatively minor and progress can be tracked through defined structural stages, greenfield projects centre on extensive civil and infrastructure works.

Because of this, milestone-based drawdown structures are often impractical. Lenders instead rely on engineering certificates and supporting invoices to verify progress and authorise drawdowns. Given the scale and variability of such works however, QS reporting is almost always required to maintain oversight and cost control.

ASAP’s Milestone-Based Approach

Unlike traditional banks, ASAP Finance does not require QS reports to fund most projects. Instead, we take a pragmatic, milestone-based approach that streamlines the process without compromising oversight.

Our progress payment schedule is typically structured around clear, definable stages such as foundation, framing, roof on, lock-up, interior completion and so on. Each milestone would correspond to a known percentage of total build cost, making it easier for developers and builders to forecast cashflow and align payments with real progress.

By removing the QS requirement, projects move faster, incur fewer third-party costs, all while maintaining robust checks and balances through council inspection reports and site verification.

Why Lenders Take It Seriously

A disciplined drawdown process is about more than just compliance – it’s about protecting project viability. By linking payments directly to verified progress and the project’s broader cost-to-complete position, developers maintain stronger control over cashflow, lenders safeguard their exposure, and projects stay on schedule.

ASAP Finance’s model strikes the right balance between efficiency and oversight, ensuring funds are advanced promptly while maintaining the integrity and financial stability of the project.

Conclusion

At ASAP Finance, we view progress payments as prudent management, not an administrative step. Each drawdown is carefully assessed to ensure the project remains in a full cost-to-complete position – protecting momentum, minimising risk, and keeping developments moving forward with confidence.